(Do the Math)

Do they look legitimate?

We're fully aware at "JustClaws" that our part-time development of Jaguar projects, with the inevitable slipping deadlines, has meant that some people feel that we're producing vapourware. Likewise, there are some other "companies" out there who are apparently producing code or products for the Jaguar but could be producing vapourware too. We hope that this objective guide to vapourware, (or as we prefer to call the imaginative projects which have swamped the Jaguar since Atari Corporations ceased to exist, "Imagination-Ware",) will help you judge what products exist, and which don't.
On this there are a few things which I would suggest you watch out for:-
1) Has the company been around for a while- at least a year perhaps?
2) Is there an individual or more than one individual clearly identified?
3) Does the company offer any explanation for supporting the Jaguar?
4) Does the web-site have a track-record, has it been around a while?
5) Does the web-site have a proper URL- or is it hosted in free space?
Can you see any evidence of credibility from the company or an individual who can explain why they are supporting the Jaguar- is there a building to see, am office address with a phone or fax number, That's a start- but good evidence should be some visual proof, perhaps pictures of the team, the development tools, the office space. In particular, even with a small part-time team, there has to be some evidence of the tools.

Do they have the kit?

(An Alpine Development Kit.)
Below, we have a photograph of an Atari Alpine developer kit, manual, and Flash ROM. This photograph has not been pulled from another web-site, I took the photo and scanned it in. Some photographs from a trade-show or a fan-event like Jag-Fest mght be an equivalent from other developers. Bear in mind pictures of the development tools may not be possible as the developer may be under NDA with somebody, in particular with Atari/Hasbro perhaps. Bear in mind also that pictures of a Jaguar Server or BJL development kit does not mean the developer has access to special tools. Both these products are publicly available, as is the Atari Alpine developer kit since the demise of Atari Corporation in 1996.

Do they have the knowledge?

Judging knowledge is a very difficult thing, but a few things may help to judge. Firstly, it is not possible to program the Atari Jaguar with just high-level languages, of which only 'C' was available in very limited form from Atari. If the project does not include people with a knowledge of M68000 assembly language, and the Jaguar RISC processors (or similar) then it isn't going to get anywhere. This may be obvious from the web-site marketing blurb. Links to other projects which the team has completed might be useful in assessing potential.
The other thing which a project needs from the developers in terms of knowledge is a technical understanding of the Jaguar. This complex piece of hardware comprises a 64-bit system with an M68000 as a boot and I/O handling CPU, a graphics processor intended (but rarely used) to run the main program lgoic, a digital sound processor which also handles the serial ports used for networking, a 64-bit blitter capable of logical operations and moving data around memory at high speed, and a 64-bit object processor which provides some of the facilities of a traditional sprite processor as well as supporting backgrounds and bitmap object scaling. Not a simply system which developers can "pick-up" in a few weeks. The normal use of assembly language and limited debugging facilities also make it hard. Consider that.

Do they have screenshots?

(Defcon1 Vapourware Screenshot)
A "claimed" screen-shot of the title screen from "DefCon 1". (The name was a bad start.) Unfortunately, even the developer was taken in by this misleading screen-shot, Dark Knight Games. Dave Belll, the guy behind that company, apparently believed tha tthe company who was doing the coding for him, (VD3D it's alleged), had written Jaguar code to produce it, but later it came to light tha this was not so. DKG alleged they were just as misled as customers. (We are not saying DKG is a fake, simply that this game, "DefCon 1", WAS vapourware.)
(An early F1 Racer Screen-Shot)
The above screen-shot is from an early ECS show demonstration of "F1 World Tour Racing" by "Teque". The game was by no means finished, but there was no way the game was a fake, Jaguar fans took this "illicit" screen-shot of the game at the show, and it clearly shows that the game was on a monitor. This is no result of playing around with "PhotoShop" or "Paint Shop Pro". (It does not, to be fair, prove it was running on a Jaguar, and indeed it is well-known that early 3DO M2 demos, and Sega DreamCast demos, did not run on the real hardware, but on more powerful systems which people thought were the "real thing". In this case, the photograph was backed by first-hand, believable, witnesses of the game running.)

Do they have a "proof" binary?

The "proof" binary is not particularly useful for a PC game or a Macintosh game, there are no special tools required to write code for those machines. However, to write a game for a console, the developer needs to obtain a "developer kit" which may cost thousands of $'s. In the case of the Jaguar, a genuine Atari devkit will cost upwards of $600 even now, (most likely at least $1100) but there are cheap "unofficial" kits, the Jaguar Server and the BJL. The BJL is popular and virtually free if you make the Jaguar modifications yourself, so if the developer only has a BJL then they may not be serious, but with an Alpine they must be! The Alpine also allows development of code designed for a real cartridge, and the BJL does not.

Do they have a track-record?

Generally, vapourware (or as we prefer to call recent Jaguar "projects", Imagination-Ware) comes from companies you've never heard of before, who appear from nowhere without any kind of history or track-record. Suddently this big company appears with a small web-site hosted somewhere like AOL or GeoCities, and announces that they have a team working on several projects to resurrect that Jaguar and other "unsupported" systems. Often these projects are quickly supported by impressive images and vague technical specs.. Quite often within a short-time, as people start to attack them on boards like Atari Interactive, their "representatives", usually from the marketing department (because these organisations are always big, and have lots of departments) start to threaten to withdraw their support.
Another element of a track-record would be if the company has other products which are already available, and which people have bought. Such companies have a value to their reputation and would not risk that with complete vapourware, at least the company or individual is likely to intend to carry out their projections, even if they are not achieved.

In conlusion... our last words.

In conclusion, we're not claiming anything for our work with Jaguar. We have plans for some interesting games, and we hope that we can release them commercially at some point. JustClaws is a "for fun" part-time venture, Richard Turner is well known in the Jaguar "scene", we have visual evidence, downloadable demos, and a 3-year history on the web. We don't even want you to buy anything, and we're not hyping up our products. We can't even promise that our games will be released, only that work is in progress and we can afford to do it. Look for other people or other companies with similar standards of proof, and you won't be facing disappointment and disallusionment in the future, we think. Go expose the fakes!
We do believe in 4Play (Battlesphere) and Carl Forhan (Protector), and also Steve Scavone (Gorf 2000), James Garvin (OMC Games- various), and ourselves (JustClaws). Not mentioning other people doesn't mean we don't believe in them, and likewise listing somebody does not mean that we believe their product will ever be released, just that we DO believe in these people. If we can't believe in the people, we can never believe in their products of course.